Ideamarket Docs
  • Introduction
  • 1-minute onboarding
  • Selling old tokens & unstaking
  • Navigating the app
    • How to make a good post
    • Citations
    • Post page
    • User Profile
    • Why rate posts?
  • $IMO token
  • So we've posted your thought
  • Offical T-Shirt
  • Join us on Discord
  • Build with us!
  • Use Cases
    • The New News
    • The Last Internet Argument
    • DeSci credibility, citations, and income
    • DAOs: Activism-for-profit
    • Prediction markets for public opinion
    • Crazy ideas
  • Roadmap
    • Partnerships & Integrations
    • Global knowledge graph
    • Bounties
  • PHILOSOPHY
    • Future epistemology (Ribbonfarm)
    • Status vs Truth
    • Summary of hypotheses
    • Heat Death of the Infoverse
    • Sun vs Wind
    • Bullshit recapture technology
    • Mirroring the world brain
    • Increasing population-scale comprehension
    • Journalism must become the trust-earning business
    • Exit the intellectual mafia
    • An Open Letter to Revolutionaries
    • Ideamarket Art
    • Does Ideamarket "measure truth"?
    • Beware "cryptographic truth" and the ledger of record
    • Meme Vault
  • FAQ
    • Why Arbitrum?
  • Past Experiments
    • Social account markets
    • The URL Market
  • Contracts
    • Quantstamp Audit
    • Overview
    • Bonding curve
    • IdeaTokenFactory
    • IdeaTokenExchange
    • InterestManager
    • IdeaTokenVault
    • MultiAction
    • IdeaTokenNameVerifier
  • Legal
    • Terms of Service
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. PHILOSOPHY

Increasing population-scale comprehension

It‘s hard to doubt what seems readily apparent.

This sounds harmless, doesn’t it?

It sounds like the basis of all science: “I looked at it, and there it was. Therefore...”

But this harmless aspect of human nature has been exploited to turn people into idiots.

All it takes is an enemy.

As soon as someone is persuaded that “only evil people believe x,” their comprehension ability is slashed.

  • If their opinion is “only evil people believe x”

  • They’re literally unable to comprehend x.

  • Why? Because if they allowed themselves to comprehend x, x might seem readily apparent.

  • Then they’d find x hard to doubt. (“It’s hard to doubt what seems readily apparent.”)

  • Which means they’d be evil, by their own definition. And that’s unacceptable.

Without willingness to agree with a belief (in the off-chance it’s true of course), people will fight like hell to make sure they don’t comprehend it.

Make sense?

By creating a profit motive around public narratives and common knowledge, Ideamarket pays people to become willing to agree with a wider variety of possible truths. In other words:

Ideamarket harnesses greed to increase comprehension.

If willingness to agree increases comprehension, And the profit motive increases willingness to agree, Then the profit motive increases comprehension.

Ideamarket is building a future in which the financial benefits of “the truth” outweigh the psycho-social benefits of “my truth” — increasing comprehension at population scale.

PreviousMirroring the world brainNextJournalism must become the trust-earning business

Last updated 4 years ago

Was this helpful?